Judge topples U.S. rejection of gay unions.

News Talk
Article Report - Eunjung Park
Author (Last name last) : Abby Goodnough and John Schwartz
Title of article : Judge topples U.S. rejection of gay unions.
Publication :  NYTimes
Date of article : ( July 8th, 2010)
Short summary (2-5 sentences)
          Judge Joseph L. Tauro of United States District Court in Boston sentenced that same-sex marriage is constitutional in two separate cases. However, the federal government doesn't allow same-sex marriage, even though one state permits their marriage. Many people argue about the marital right of gay and lesbian couples. In addition, they dispute whether same-sex marriage has benefit as much as heterosexual marriage or not. Moreover, the federal government has the right to judge the quality of same-sex marriage.  
Issues that you can find
-What do you think of the marital right of gay and lesbian couples?
-Do you think that the federal government has the right to judge the quality of same-sex marriage?
-Do you think that same-sex marriage has benefit as much as heterosexual marriage?
-If you want to marry to someone, but you can't marry because of the federal laws; In that situation, what will you do?; How would you feel?
-Let's suppose that the federal government permits same-sex marriage. Should the federal government permit them to adopt?; Do you know that some same-sex couples want adoption?
Your opinion (2-5 sentences)
I think that the judge is correct, and the federal government should allow same-sex marriage because the marital freedom is one of the human's right. Although a man wants to marry a same-sex person, it doesn't bother other people. Moreover, the federal government doesn't have a rational basis to judge the quality of same-sex marriage comparing with heterosexual marriage. In my opinion, it's not important whether the marriage has a lot of benefit or not. The important thing is that the marriage makes people happy.